Legal Opinion

Hight v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1884No. 11,248PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellee Mary M. Taylor against the appellants Hight and Handy, administrators *393of the estate of J. S. Smith Hunter, deceased, for the recovery of the proceeds of a certain policy of insurance, executed by the Continental Life Insurance Company, of Hartford, on the life of such decedent. The cause was put at issue and tried by the court, and, at the appellants’ request, the court made a special finding of the facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon. The appellants excepted to the conclusions of law, and, over their motion for a new trial, the court rendered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sidener v. PaveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hewitt v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hayden v. CretcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Cornelius v. CoughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Smith v. OstermeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adams v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Rausch v. Trustees of the United Brethren in Christ ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Plunkett v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Scott v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Damron v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API