Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Rossbach

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 31, 2023No. 15ag/22PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Natasha Veytsman Rossbach, AG No. 15, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Biran, J. ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT – DISCIPLINE – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION – Respondent Natasha Veytsman Rossbach violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1 (Competence), 19-301.3 (Diligence), 19-301.4(a) (Communication), 19-301.5(a) (Fees), 19-301.16(d) (Declining or Terminating Representation), 19-308.1(a) and (b) (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), and 19-308.4(a), (c), and (d) (Misconduct). These violations arose from Ms. Rossbach’s conduct in two…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. El-ShallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. HechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API