Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Rossbach
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Natasha Veytsman Rossbach, AG No. 15, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Biran, J. ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT – DISCIPLINE – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION – Respondent Natasha Veytsman Rossbach violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1 (Competence), 19-301.3 (Diligence), 19-301.4(a) (Communication), 19-301.5(a) (Fees), 19-301.16(d) (Declining or Terminating Representation), 19-308.1(a) and (b) (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), and 19-308.4(a), (c), and (d) (Misconduct). These violations arose from Ms. Rossbach’s conduct in two…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. El-ShallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. HechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025