Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Witmeyer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1996PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff had been designated as a one-fifth remainder beneficiary in an August 1986 amendment to a revocable trust created by the settlor six years earlier. Unbeknownst to plaintiff, the settlor executed a fourth amendment in December 1988, removing plaintiff as beneficiary, which remained in effect at the settlor’s death three years later. Plaintiff brought this action against the settlor’s trustee, her attorneys and one of the remainder beneficiaries for allegedly depriving her of her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vogt v. WitmeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty And Surety Co. v. Aniero Concrete Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Snyder v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Weizmann Institute of Science v. NeschisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Aniero Concrete Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Barclay v. CastruccioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API