Legal Opinion

Barclay v. Castruccio

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 30, 2020No. 30/19PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darlene Barclay v. Sadie M. Castruccio, No. 30, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Adkins, J. TORT—INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH AN INHERITANCE OR GIFT—CAUSE OF ACTION: Maryland recognizes as a cause of action the tort of intentional interference with an inheritance or gift, and adopts the standards set forth in Section 19 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Economic Harm. TORT—INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH AN INHERITANCE OR GIFT—TIMING OF INTERFERENCE: When one intentionally interferes with an inheritance, one is interfering with the relationship between the testator and a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown ManorSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Chavis v. Blibaum & Assoc. Moore v. Peak Mgmt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Cain v. Midland FundingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Hancock v. Mayor & Cty. Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Aleti v. Metropolitan Baltimore, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API