Legal Opinion
Weizmann Institute of Science v. Neschis
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 3, 2002No. 00 CIV.7850(RMB). No. 01 CIV.6993(RMB)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERMAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Weizmann Institute of Science (“Weizmann”) commenced an action against defendants Janet C. Neschis (“Neschis”), Robert R. Littman (“Lift-man”), and Marilyn G. Diamond (“Diamond”) (collectively, “Defendants”) on or about October 16, 2000. Weizmann’s complaint (‘Weizmann Complaint”) alleges six causes of action: (i) declaratory judgment that Weizmann is entitled to 37% of the assets of the Anturia Foundation, a non-party; (ii) conversion; (hi) tortious interference with contractual relations; (iv) tor-tious interference with expectancy of…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Abercrombie v. Andrew CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Gross v. WaywellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Kalimantano GmbH v. Motion in Time, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.