Legal Opinion

Ewen-Massa v. Hemmerlein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred. Plaintiff Alice Ewen-Massa returned to defendant’s office seeking treatment "for a matter related to the initial treatment” (McDermott v Torre, 56 NY2d 399, 406) and was treated by defendant’s physician’s assistant. We conclude that there is a sufficient relationship between the physician’s assistant and defendant to warrant application of the continuous treatment doctrine and that the complaint was not untimely (see, CPLR 214-a;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Watkins v. FrommAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Pierre-Louis v. Ching-Yuan HwaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Ganapolskaya v. VIP Medical AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Cappelluti v. SckolnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dolce v. PowalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API