Legal Opinion

Caledonian Co. v. Trustees of Hoosick Falls

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1832PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to set aside a certiorari, because allowed by a commissioner. The certiorari issued to bring up the proceedings of the trustees in reference to the imposition of a village tax. The trustees made a return to the certiorari, and on the 22Ó. day of December last, the plaintiffs obtained a rule for a supplementary return, although opposed by the defendants, who now applied .to quash the certiorari, because allowed by a commissioner, and not by the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The certiorari ought to have been allowed by this court, and not by a commissioner; but I am inclined to think that the order of this court directing a supplementary return, was a ratification of the act of the commissioner, and an adoption of the writ, so -that it may now be considered as allowed by the court. The motion is therefore denied.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Church v. Supervisors of AlleganyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Bissell v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Smith v. OdellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1844
  4. Wilson v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1855
  5. Wilson v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1854