Legal Opinion
Stich v. Pirkl
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action in replevin.
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
The plaintiff is the purchaser of some personal property under a sale had upon the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage which covered the property. The defendant Seiden is the assignee for the benefit of creditors of the mortgagor. The defendant Pirkl maintains a warehouse where the goods are stored. The plaintiff sues in replevin. The defendants claim that the mortgage was void because not promptly filed. The fact is the mortgage was not filed for more than ten months after it was made.
Section 230 of the Lien Law provides that every mortgage for personal property where the goods remain in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Skilton v. . CodingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Karst v. . GaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Titusville Iron Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- National Tradesmen's Bank v. WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors By PellegriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Norma Footwear Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- In re BraytonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1922
- In re the Benefit of Creditors of National New York Packing & Shipping Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1957