Legal Opinion

People v. Hicks

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1993No. S026853PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

In People v. Siko (1988) 45 Cal.3d 820, 822 [248 Cal.Rptr. 110, 755 P.2d 294], we held that the enactment of Penal Code section 667.6, subdivision (c), which permits the imposition of consecutive full-term sentences when a defendant has been convicted of certain enumerated sexual offenses, did not repeal the prohibition of Penal Code section 654 against multiple punishment based upon “the same act or omission.”1 In this case, we address the question we expressly left unresolved in Siko: whether the enactment of section 667.6, subdivision (c), created an exception to section…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API