People v. Benson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
In 1994, the Legislature, and thereafter the electorate, enacted similar “Three Strikes” laws. (See Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12.)1 Under these provisions, a defendant who has one qualifying prior conviction, or “strike,” may receive a lengthier sentence than would have been possible without that strike, and a defendant with two strikes may receive an even lengthier sentence. (See People v. Superior Court {Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497, 504-506 [53 Cal.Rptr.2d 789, 917 P.2d 628] {Romero).) In the present case, defendant has two prior felony convictions— (1)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- People v. CarmonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. HesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. CorreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.