Legal Opinion

Succession of Tyson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 4, 1937No. 34095PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

This proceeding was instituted by the sole surviving child of Louisa Tyson Gibson, deceased, and by the descendants of certain children of decedent who survived her but have since died, to have themselves recognized as the irregular heirs of the deceased and, as such, placed in possession of her estate to the exclusion of the descendants of the decedent’s other children against whom plaintiffs have pleaded the prescription of thirty years under the provisions of article 1030 of the Revised Civil Code.

Plaintiffs alleged that Richard Gibson and Louisa Tyson Gibson were married…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. Taylor v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Generes v. Bowie Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  4. Succession of AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  5. Landry v. American Creosote WorksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tillery v. FullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. State v. HagertySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  3. Tyson v. SpearmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Lee v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. Jackson v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API