Nunn v. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the Plaintiff Stephen Nunn’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 procedural due process claim against Defendant John W. Lynch. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the district court’s order of August 27, 2003, and remand with instructions for the district court to grant the motion and to dismiss, with prejudice, the action against Defendant Lynch on the basis of Lynch’s qualified immunity.
I
Plaintiff Stephen Nunn, an attorney employed by the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, filed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Leary v. DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Frank Savel v. MetroHealth Sys.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Durham v. MartinDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Medlin v. City of AlgoodDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Parrish v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Blick v. Ann Arbor Public School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.