Legal Opinion

Parrish v. City of Wilmington

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 28, 2014No. 1:13-CV-00633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Richard Stanforth (doc. 7), Defendants’ the City of Wilmington and Randy Riley’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 9), Plaintiffs Consolidated Response (doc. 15), Defendant Stanforth’s Reply (doc. 16), and Defendant City of Wilmington and Riley’s Reply (doc. 17). For the reasons indicated herein, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motions.

I. Background

The following is alleged in Plaintiffs Complaint, which the Court will take as true for purposes of its consideration of Defendants’…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guy v. Board of Education Rock Hill Local SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  2. John McDonald v. Robert Derry, Adam Rosenberg, Jack Goncalves, Brian Foley, James Rovella, Stavros Mellekas, and Jason St. JohnDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API