Armour v. Klecker
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.
Jonathon Armour and Tami Peloquin appeal a judgment that awarded them a portion of their security deposit, but denied double damages and attorney fees. 2 They contend that the trial court erred because pursuant to sec. 100.20(5), Stats., the trial court was required to award them double damages and attorney fees. We conclude that because the wrongful withholding of a tenant's security deposit is a violation of Wis. Adm. Code sec. Ag 134.06(3), Armour and Peloquin are entitled to double damages and attorney fees under sec. 100.20(5). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shands v. CastrovinciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Gonzalez v. TeskeyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Moonlight v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LongmireCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- State v. C. Spielvogel & Sons Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Pierce v. NorwickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Boelter v. TschantzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009