Legal Opinion

Boelter v. Tschantz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 22, 2009No. 2009AP1011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, EJ.

¶ 1. Terri Boelter appeals a judgment, and an order denying her motion for reconsideration, entered after a trial de novo on claims against her landlord. Boelter seeks double damages, costs, attorney fees, punitive damages, and rent abatement due to claimed improper withholdings from her security deposit and a failure to remedy unsafe conditions. We agree, in part, with Boelter's arguments and remand for further fact-finding, the calculation and awarding of costs, attorney fees, and rent abatement, and consideration of punitive damages.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. Pursuant to a written lease,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shands v. CastrovinciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hallin v. HallinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Armour v. KleckerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. Raymaker v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Centrifugal Acquisition Corp. v. MoonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  2. Team Property Management Llc v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API