Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Norwick

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 22, 1996No. 96-0067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

Richard and Rhonda Pierce appeal from a judgment denying their motion to double their damages award before calculating the offset of damages awarded to Gary and Susann Norwick and awarding them reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the trial court, rather than the actual fees submitted by their attorney. On appeal, the Pierces make the following claims: (1) the jury's award of damages in the amount of $1000 should have been doubled pursuant to § 100.20(5), Stats., prior to calculating the offset of damages awarded to the Norwicks; and (2) their request for attorney's fees in the amount…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shands v. CastrovinciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Touchett v. E Z Paintr Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Moonlight v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Three & One Co. v. GeilfussCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Paulik v. CoombsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  2. Jack L. Slinger v. The Pendaform CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
  3. Kuehn v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API