Virgil v. Reorganized MW Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. After considering the motion, the Joint Response of the defendants, and the plaintiffs Rebuttal, the Court finds that the motion to remand is well taken and should therefore be granted.
I. Facts and Proceedings
Plaintiff Eddie Virgil (“Virgil”) sought to sue the Reorganized M.W. Co., Inc., the Montgomery Ward Credit Corporation, the Monogram Credit Card Bank of Georgia, the Northland Group, Inc., and Equi-fax (“the Defendants”) in the circuit court of Copiah County, Mississippi. Virgil…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colorado Capital v. OwensDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Agre v. Rain & Hail LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Desmond v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Marshall v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Washington v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.