Legal Opinion
USCOC of New Hampshire RSA 2 v. Town of Hopkinton
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 9, 2001No. Civil No. C-00-421-JM. Opinion No. 2001DNH073PPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MUIRHEAD, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff USCOC of New Hampshire RSA # 2 d/b/a United States Cellular (“U.S. Cellular”) seeks an order compelling the Town of Hopkinton, New Hampshire (“Hopkinton” or “Town”) to issue U.S. Cellular all permits and approvals necessary for the construction of a wireless telecommunications tower on a 114-acre parcel of land located in the Dimond Hill area of Hopkinton. After Hopkinton’s Planning Board denied U.S. Cellular’s application for a waiver and conditional use permit to construct the tower on Dimond Hill, U.S. Cellular filed the present…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Town of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Penobscot Air Services, Ltd. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- USCOC of New Hampshire RSA 2, Inc. v. City of FranklinDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
- USCOC of New Hampshire RSA 2, Inc. v. Town of BowDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
- Industrial Tower v. Town of EppingDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- USCOC v. City of FranklinDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006