Legal Opinion
USCOC of New Hampshire RSA 2, Inc. v. Town of Bow
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided June 13, 2007No. 05-cv-327-PBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BARBADORO, District Judge.
The Magistrate Judge has prepared a detailed and thoughtful Amended Report and Recommendation addressing the arguments presented by the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Having considered U.S. Cellular’s objections and reviewed the matter de novo, I agree that the disposition recommended by the Magistrate Judge is correct.
The Report and Recommendation is approved (Doc. No. 66).
SO ORDERED.
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MUIRHEAD, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff USCOC of New Hampshire RSA # 2 (“US Cellular”) is a provider of personal wireless…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1398, 35 fed.r.serv.3d 395 Miguel Angel Ayala-Gerena v. Bristol Myers-Squibb Company, D/B/A Bristol Myers-SquibbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Carroll v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- T-Mobile Northeast, LLC et al v. Town of Bedford, NH et alDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- Uscoc of Greater Missouri v. Vill. of MarlboroughDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009