Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Ishee
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 1, 2006No. 1:01CV02049PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND DECISION
[Resolving Document # 40]
ADAMS, District Judge.
The Court referred the above action to Magistrate Judge Jack B. Streepy for a Report and Recommendation on Petitioner Rasheem Matthews’s Petition for Habeas Corpus. The Magistrate recommended that the Court dismiss the Petition based on his finding that Matthews’s due process rights were not violated by prosecutorial misconduct. Matthews filed Objections to the Recommendation. Respondent Todd Ishee, Warden, has not responded to those Objections. Subsequently, Matthews filed two Notices of Additional Authority in support of his…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rasheem Matthews v. Todd IsheeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Matthews v. IsheeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007