Legal Opinion
United States v. Jerry Jerome Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 19, 2014No. 13-12945PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHLESINGER, District Judge:
Jerry Jerome Anderson appeals the district court’s denial of his second motion for a sentence reduction based on Amend ment 750 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Sentencing Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The government argues that the district court did not even have jurisdiction to consider Anderson’s second motion because he had already fully litigated one § 3582(c)(2) motion based on Amendment 750. The text of § 3582(c)(2) is silent on the availability of second' or successive motions based on the same Amendment to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Gonzalo De Jesus TamayoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Kevyn TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Pedro Rafael Caraballo-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Wallace v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- United States v. David MayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Theresa CaltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.