Legal Opinion

Jones v. . Henderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought to recover damages for injury to the plaintiff's premises, situated on Poplar (or Charles) Street, by the improper construction of a granolithic sidewalk in front of the same. The plaintiff, after alleging the incorporation of the defendant as a town, with the usual powers to open and improve its streets, avers that, "in the year 1890 the plaintiff, having due regard to the long established and existing grade of Charles (or Poplar) Street, erected upon his lot a residence, at great cost to himself, and at additional great cost constructed drain pipes, Or conduits, for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Barton v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Hitchins Bros. v. Mayor of FrostburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  5. Jeffress v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Calhoun v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Williams v. Elm City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Thomas v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Giaconi v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API