Legal Opinion

Carl R. Bieber, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 1971No. Appeals Nos. 1010 T.D. 1970, and 1011 T.D. 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This is before us on appeal of an order of the Public Utility Commission which issued an amended certificate of public convenience to Reading Bus Company, Inc., intervenor.

Carl R. Bieber, Inc. and Capitol Bus Company, Inc., protestants to Reading’s application, have appealed the extension of Reading’s service rights on the grounds that the Commission failed to base its order upon substantial evidence of need for the proposed service and/or of inadequacy of existing services. We find the appeals to be without merit and affirm the order.

Reading operates regular…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zurcher v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. H. J. Gongaware & Sons v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Reeder v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Purolator Courier Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Radio Telephone Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Seiferd v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Philboro Coach Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API