Legal Opinion
Philboro Coach Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 1982No. Appeals, Nos. 401 C.D. 1981, 405 C.D. 1981 and 416 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
These consolidated petitions seek review of an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC or Commission) which granted the request of Starr Transit Company (Applicant) to transport, as a common car*178rier, persons in group and party service1 from points in the city and county of Philadelphia and from points in the counties of Montgomery and Delaware to points in Pennsylvania.2 The case is presently before this Court for the second time, the PUC’s original order granting transportation authority having been previously vacated and. remanded for failure to articulate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- H. J. Gongaware & Sons v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Byerly v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Dutchland Tours, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Burleson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Gettysburg Tours, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coder v. Commonwealth, State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Borough of Ridgway v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Process Gas Consumers Group v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984