Estate of Michael Lewis v. Concord General Mutual Insurance Company
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Dissent
ALEXANDER, J.,
with whom MEAD, J., joins, dissenting.
[¶ 20] The Court’s opinion competently discusses the principles of law incident to resolution of a matter on summary judgment. However, in suggesting that the claims by the Estate create a dispute as to material fact that what happened here only constituted “preliminary negotiations” and not a final sale and transfer of ownership, the Court minimizes undisputed facts that establish, as a matter of law, that the transaction at issue here was a final sale and transfer of ownership. By minimizing the undisputed facts, the Court alters our law…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Bahre v. PearlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Ford v. HowgateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
- Bell v. Red Ball Potato Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981