Legal Opinion

Hassoun v. Cimmino

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 22, 2000No. CIV.A.98-5530(JAG)PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENAWAY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motions of defendants Lawrence Cim-mino, Florence J. Lotrowski, and. the County of Middlesex, New Jersey (collectively, “Defendants” or the “Middlesex defendants”) for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), and Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the Complaint. 1 Plaintiffs instituted this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the Middlesex defendants deprived Plaintiffs of their constitutional rights. 2 After submitting opposition to Defendants’ motions, Plaintiffs sought…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Mantz v. ChainDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  2. Mueller Co. v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
  3. DiAntonio v. Vanguard Funding, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. ABELARD v. CLEAN EARTH, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  5. AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL INC v. YIMDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API