Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1924No. 18261PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The purpose of this action was to adjudicate the water rights of the various riparian owners on, and appropriators of water from, Alpowa creek.

That creek is a small, non-navigable stream, about twenty-five miles long, rising in the Blue Mountains, in the southern part of Garfield county, flows in an easterly direction through Garfield and Asotin counties and discharges into the Snake river. The average pre*11cipitation in the vicinity of the creek is about eighteen inches per annum, six inches of which is during the irrigating season. The creek supplies sufficient water to irrigate all the lands…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Benton v. JohncoxWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hargrave v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Wimer v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Colville Confederated Tribes v. Boyd Walton, Jr., Et UxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Neubert v. Yakima-Tieton Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Van Tassel Real Estate & Livestock Co. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API