Legal Opinion

Eakright v. Torrent

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Defendant was the owner of certain timber in the townships of Muskegon and Dalton, in Muskegon county, and entered into a contract with the plaintiff, by the terms of which the plaintiff agreed to cut, haul, and deliver to the defendant, at his mill in the city of Muskegon, all the timber upon the descriptions of land named, at the agreed price of $á per thousand feet, payable at stated intervals. The plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that, after about 6,000,000 feet of the logs were cut, the defendant prevented the completion of the contract by the plaintiff and this suit is on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hemminger v. Western Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Malone v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. McGregor v. Estate of RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Chapman v. DeaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Johnson v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co. v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Sullivan v. Ross' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API