Legal Opinion

Malone v. Gates

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The parties to this suit entered into the following contract:

“St. Charles, Mich., Jan 6, 1887.
“This agreement, made this day by and between Malone Brothers, of Taymouth, Michigan, of the first part, and S. G-. M. Gates, of Bay City, Michigan, of the second part, witnesseth:
“ That said first parties hereby sell to S. G. M. Gates about five hundred thousand feet of dry and green pine, now on skids on the east, half of the south-west quarter of section 14, town 10, range 2 east, and the north-east quarter of section 11, township 10, range 1 east, except as hereinafter named, and deliver the same…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Moore v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co. v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Hayday v. Hammermill Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Bresnahan v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API