Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1929No. 6 Div. 414PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action of assumpsit by appellee against appellant. The complaint consists of two counts; the first is the common count for money due by account, and the second declares for money due as rent under a contract between the plaintiff and defendant for the months of October and November, 1923, for premises in Inglenook; Ala., known as the W. W. 'Coghill building, rented by the plaintiff to the defendant, which the defendant failed or refused to pay. The pleas were not indebted, and a denial of the allegation of the complaint, both in legal effect the general issue.

The evidence is without dispute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. KirschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mobile O. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Becker Roofing Co. v. CarrollAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Lipscomb v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Associates Investment Company v. HammSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API