Legal Opinion

Warner v. Warner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1931No. 3 Div. 964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

It has been repeatedly ruled by this court that trial courts cannot be put in error for refusing special written instructions requested by the parties, in respect to the degree of conviction in the minds of the jury essential to establish an issue of fact, that are not expressed in the exact and appropriate language of the law, which is that they must be reasonably satisfied from the evidence.

Charge 10-a is faulty in this respect, and was refused wihout error. Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. Nelson, 216 Ala. 149, 112 So. 422; Cain v. Skillin, 219 Ala. 228, 121 So. 521, 64 A. L. R. 1022; Alabama…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyette v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Cain v. SkillinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Wallace v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pittman v. CalhounSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Pan American Petroleum Co. v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. WallerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Davis v. WingardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Lipscomb v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API