Legal Opinion

Mobile O. R. Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1933No. 1 Div. 721PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

On the three former appeals in this case (219 Ala. 238, 121 So. 722, 221 Ala. 402, 129 So. 60, 224 Ala. 125, 139 So. 337), we held in substance that, because it was the duty of deceased to check the numbers and seals of each of the seven box cars, and numbers on the three coal cars in the “cut” in question, and that to do so he must examine the seals on both sides of the box cars and record the result of such examination, and because the jury could reasonably find that he had not completed the work, and that under the circumstances of this case it was not unusual, but rather…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. HolbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Smith v. BaggettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Mobile O. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Bahakel v. Great Southern Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Conner v. ForeggerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Miller v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API