Legal Opinion

Eckerd Corp. v. J & S, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 25, 2009No. Civil Action 08-6252(JEI)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRENAS, Senior District Judge:

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Enforcement Issue. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion will be granted and Defendants’ Motion will be denied. 1

I

This case arises out of a Settlement Agreement reached in Einhorn v. J & S, Inc., 577 F.Supp.2d 752 (D.N.J.2008) (Irenas, S.D.J.) (hereinafter “the Fund-J & S Case”), between the Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia & Vicinity (“the Fund”) and J & S, Inc. 2 (“J & S”). In the Fund-J & S Case, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API