Legal Opinion

Bank of Ukiah v. Gibson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1895No. 16,662PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Mendocino County; R. W. Crump, Judge. Action by the Bank of Ukiah against E. S. Gibson and others to foreclose a mortgage. Prom a judgment denying plaintiff a foreclosure as to part of the property, it appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

This is an action by the Bank of Ukiah (a corporation) to foreclose two mortgages executed by E. S. Gibson, to secure the payment of a promissory note made by him to said bank. One of the mortgages was upon certain real property, and the other a chattel mortgage upon three thousand five hundred head of sheep, more or less, and one hundred head of neat cattle, more or less, upon a certain ranch therein described. The court entered a decree in favor of plaintiff for the foreclosure of the mortgages and sale of the real property and the neat cattle, but denied a foreclosure as to the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greenough v. GreenoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  2. McMahon v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Berson v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Stringer v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Tregear v. Etiwanda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strahorn-Hutton-Evans Commission Co. v. FlorerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API