City of Tacoma v. William Rogers Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
The City of Tacoma contends that the trial court erred in ordering a partial refund of municipal business and occupation (B&O) taxes to the William Rogers Company, Inc., doing business as Evergreen Staffing (Evergreen). The trial court held that Evergreen, a temporary staffing service, was a mere agent or paymaster of its clients and therefore the wages paid to its workers were deductible as a “pass through” expense. We reverse and hold that Evergreen functioned as the actual employer of its temporary workers and is thus liable for the tax.
B&O tax is a tax on the gross revenue of a business.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Walthew v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Alexander Myers & Co. v. HopkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Rho Company v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Washington Imaging Services, LLC v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Imaging Services v. State Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Ongom v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.