Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. William Rogers Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2002No. 71050-3PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

The City of Tacoma contends that the trial court erred in ordering a partial refund of municipal business and occupation (B&O) taxes to the William Rogers Company, Inc., doing business as Evergreen Staffing (Evergreen). The trial court held that Evergreen, a temporary staffing service, was a mere agent or paymaster of its clients and therefore the wages paid to its workers were deductible as a “pass through” expense. We reverse and hold that Evergreen functioned as the actual employer of its temporary workers and is thus liable for the tax.

B&O tax is a tax on the gross revenue of a business.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Walthew v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Alexander Myers & Co. v. HopkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rho Company v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Washington Imaging Services, LLC v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Imaging Services v. State Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Ongom v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API