Prevado Village Partnership v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
In its complaint, plaintiff, a partnership, seeks damages for breach by defendant, acting through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), of an alleged implied-in-fact agreement to award plaintiff a construction contract under the Section 8 New Construction Program, which began as part of the 1974 general revision of the Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (1976). Plaintiff further claims that HUD violated its own regulations, which not only constituted a breach of this implied-in-fact contract, but also resulted in a violation of plaintiff’s Fifth…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- LaChance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Singleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Busby School of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.