Legal Opinion

Prevado Village Partnership v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 22, 1983No. 156-82CPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

In its complaint, plaintiff, a partnership, seeks damages for breach by defendant, acting through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), of an alleged implied-in-fact agreement to award plaintiff a construction contract under the Section 8 New Construction Program, which began as part of the 1974 general revision of the Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (1976). Plaintiff further claims that HUD violated its own regulations, which not only constituted a breach of this implied-in-fact contract, but also resulted in a violation of plaintiff’s Fifth…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  5. Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. LaChance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. Johns-Manville Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Singleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  5. Busby School of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API