Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 25, 1991No. ACM 27726 (f rev)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT UPON FURTHER REVIEW

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Appraising the results of a hearing we directed under United States v. Dubay, 17 U.S.C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R. 411 (1967), we: (a) set aside findings of guilty as to rape; and (b) order a new trial as to indecent acts.

History of the Case

Sergeant Taylor was convicted by a general court-martial consisting of members of rape and indecent acts with his step-daughter, MC. His approved sentence is a dishonorable discharge, seven years confinement, total forfeitures, and reduction to airman basic.

After trial, MC (the principal prosecution…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. HayeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. BaconUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. HoganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PalaciosU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API