Legal Opinion
United States v. Hogan
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided May 13, 1985No. 47,158; ACM 23771PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
Appellant was convicted of two specifications of rape, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920. The United States Air Force Court of Military Review, 16 M.J. 549, ruled that certain evidence as to one of the rapes was improperly admitted, so it dismissed that specification. Affirming the remaining specification, the court reassessed the sentence.* We granted review to ascertain whether the evidence pertaining to the dismissed specification prejudiced appellant as to the remaining specification (17 M.J. 277). Holding that it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. LotschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- United States v. SturdivantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. WeymouthCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. GambleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. HayeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.