Legal Opinion

Lucomsky v. Palmer

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

Motion denied. At the outset it will be clearly understood that the position, prestige and wealth of the parties involved play no part in the decision of the question under advisement. The fact that among the defendants are the mighty and perhaps influential metropolitan newspapers cannot and will not sway the court. That plaintiffs are comparatively insignificant and unimportant must not out of sympathy awaken a prejudice in their favor. In law or in equity the court stands blind to personality and vigorous in its adherence to an even holding of the scales of justice. Approaching the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Locker v. . American Tobacco CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Sultan v. Star Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Biber Bros. News Co. v. New York Evening Post, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People ex rel. McGoldrick v. FolletteNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lepler v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API