Legal Opinion
Biber Bros. News Co. v. New York Evening Post, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
By separate motions, the defendant New York Evening Post, Inc. (hereinafter called “ Post ”), and the defendants Dickson seek the dismissal of the amended complaint because of its claimed failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 106.) Here deemed admitted are facts in effect as follows:(a) The plaintiff, a wholesale newspaper distributor, and the defendant Post, publisher of a newspaper, on August 20, 1927, entered into an agreement that plaintiff should be the sole distributor in the sale of the said newspaper in the city of Yonkers and its…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Bogardus v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coleman & Morris v. PisciottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Harris v. Home Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Cohen v. Brunswick Record Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Union Circulation Co. v. Hardel Publishers Service Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Alexander's Department Stores, Inc. v. Ohrbach's Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.