Legal Opinion
Gould, Inc. v. a & M Battery & Tire Service
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 4, 1997No. Civ. 3:CV-91-1714PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLOCATION OF COSTS
CONABOY, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
By Order dated January 28, 1997, (Doc. 1579), this Court bifurcated the trial of this case into four (4) phases. 1 On Monday, February 24, 1997, the Court conducted the first day of the non-jury trial. Thereafter, the Court held sixteen (16) court days of testimony concerning the allocation of response costs among the plaintiffs and defendants. In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the following constitutes this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The present findings of fact and conclusions of law…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- New Castle County Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Zeneca, Inc. v. Halliburton Nus CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Control Data Corp. v. S.C.S.C. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company, Farmland Industries, Inc., and Maytag Corporation, McKesson Corporation v. Gary W. Flanders Great Northern Transportation Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Compaction Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Armstrong Cleaners, Inc. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
- Cpc International, Inc. v. Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Action Manufacturing Co. v. Simon Wrecking Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Grand Street Artists v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.