State v. Waterberry
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Abbott, J.:
This is a direct appeal by Robert R. Waterberry from his conviction following a plea of guilty of one count of aggravated sodomy (K.S.A. 21-3506).
Waterberry contends that the information charging him with aggravated sodomy is fatally defective because it fails to allege he was not married to the victim when the act occurred and that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing the defendant to a term of 10 years to life and in refusing to modify that sentence.
The information does not set forth the victim’s sex, age, or that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Murphy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. AlfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.