Smith v. Jeppsen
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, we determine whether section 10-1-185, C.R.S. (2011), applies prospectively to this action and precludes admission of evidence of the amounts paid by the plaintiffs insurance company pursuant to the plaintiff's medical expense coverage. We hold that the trial court was correct in applying section 10-1-185 here because the statute pertains to cases pending recovery as of August 11, 2010. Further, we hold that the trial court correctly excluded from evidence the amount of the insurance company's payments because section 10-1-135(10)(a) codifies…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Stamp v. Vail Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CrossgroveSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Sunahara v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Smith v. KinninghamColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re Maribel Ronquillo and Martin Cerda v. EcoClean Home Services, Inc. and Jessie WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Accetta v. Brooks Towers Residences Condo. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.