Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Crossgrove
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
T1 In this pre-verdiet collateral source case, we determine whether the court of appeals erred when it held that the trial court incorrectly admitted evidence of the amount paid by an insurance provider for the medical expenses Respondent Larry Cross-grove incurred as a result of Petitioner Wal-Mart's negligence. We hold that the court of appeals correctly held that the trial court should have excluded evidence of the amounts paid because the common law evi-dentiary component of the collateral source doctrine requires the exclusion. We thus affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
I. Facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Corsentino v. CordovaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Banning v. PresterColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Sunahara v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Jean Dedmon v. Debbie SteelmanTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Leaf v. BeihofferColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Smith v. JeppsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.