Legal Opinion

State v. Roth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2010No. C071538CR; A138078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant was convicted on stipulated facts of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, possession of a forged instrument, and identity theft. Defendant filed a pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of her purse following a vehicle stop. She assigns error to the trial court’s grant of the state’s motion to strike as untimely a memorandum of law in support of her motion to suppress that she filed on the day of trial, which, in effect, resulted in the summary denial of the motion to suppress. We affirm.

We take the pertinent facts from an affidavit that defendant’s trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. Jacinto-LeivaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API