Legal Opinion

State v. Oxford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2017No. C112623CR, C140104CR; A159461 (Control), A159462PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SERCOMBE, S. J.

In this consolidated criminal case, defendant challenges the trial court’s decision to strike his motion to suppress and its subsequent entry of judgments revoking his probation and convicting him of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, unlawful manufacture of a destructive device, ORS 166.384, and unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. The trial court struck defendant’s motion to suppress on the ground that the motion failed to “adequately appris[e] the Court as to what the issues are,” and, therefore, failed to comply with Uniform Trial Court Rule…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. BaughmanOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. MeharryOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HallamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. Jacinto-LeivaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. Jacinto-LeivaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. YemelyanovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API