Legal Opinion

Homestead Borough v. Defense Plant Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1947No. Appeals, 67 and 68PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The principal questions' raised on these appeals are (1) whether the Defense Plant Corporation, a Federal instrumentality (hereinafter referred to as the Plant), is subject to a lien under Pennsylvania’s Municipal Lien Act 1 in respect of a tax assessed by a local borough against the Plant’s land, buildings, machinery and equipment and, if so, (2) whether a judgment on a writ of Sci. Fa. to continue the lien of the tax may include interest for delinquency in payment and an attorney’s commission for collection, both as prescribed by Pennsylvania statute.

The Plant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Pittman v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Irving B. Gruber v. Owens-Illinois Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority v. Aston TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Viso v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. McKENNA v. Art Pearl Works, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API