Seligman v. Estate of Ten Eyck
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Plaintiffs appeal from rejection of claim in probate court. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is the fourth time this case has been in this Court, and each time it has reached us upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiffs. It will be found reported as follows: 49 Mich. 104 (13 N. W. Rep. 377); 53 Id. 285 (18 N. W. Rep. 818); and 60 Id. 267 (27 N. W. Rep. 514). It will not be necessary to state the facts at issue, except in so far as they bear ujmn the assignment of errors discussed.
As the case now appears before us, the plaintiffs show the delivery of 2,147,130 feet of logs under the contract between their assignor, J. P. Kroll, and the firm of C. & E. Ten Eyck. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Coyle v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- McMillan v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Tilden v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Sloan v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Germain v. Central Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Sewall v. FellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Pinch v. WillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896