Legal Opinion

Pinch v. Willard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Replevin by Benjamin W. Pinch against Aaron H. Willard. From a money judgment in his favor as for a lien upon the property, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The parties to this action settled accounts upon May 15, 1890, and found the sum of $1,853.48 due from the defendant to the plaintiff. The sum of $1,500 was thereupon paid, leaving a balance of $353.48. It *205should be added that the defendant claims that this included some usurious items, i. e., that such were included in the settlement. The amount of these does not appear. A chattel mortgage covering the property in controversy (excepting the horses) was given to plaintiff at this time. The plaintiff claims, and there was evidence tending to show, that their dealings continued until November…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Streeter v. StreeterIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. People ex rel. Farrington v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Cooper v. BrockMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Kohl v. LynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rubin v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Robair v. DahlMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. Flynn v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API