Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Bridge

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1936No. 6951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

Appeal from a dismissal of a petition for reclamation of certain trailers which appellant claimed to have sold to the Interstate Motor Freight Corporation (herein referred to as Interstate Corporation) under a conditional sales contract. The special master allowed the unpaid balance of $3,854, plus interest, as a general claim, deciding that the contract was intended by the parties to operate as a chattel mortgage, which since it was not recorded, was invalid under Michigan law. 3 Comp. Laws of 1929, § 13424.1 The report of the special master was confirmed by the District…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. McMillan v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Dickinson v. O. & W. THUM CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  5. Atlanta Knitting Mills v. Nathanson Bros.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  2. Thos. S. Aubry Co. v. United Toledo Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  3. Bagley v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Industrial Commission of Ohio v. Highway Const. Co. of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. New Southern Ohio Gas Co. v. RoushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API