Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Bridge
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
Appeal from a dismissal of a petition for reclamation of certain trailers which appellant claimed to have sold to the Interstate Motor Freight Corporation (herein referred to as Interstate Corporation) under a conditional sales contract. The special master allowed the unpaid balance of $3,854, plus interest, as a general claim, deciding that the contract was intended by the parties to operate as a chattel mortgage, which since it was not recorded, was invalid under Michigan law. 3 Comp. Laws of 1929, § 13424.1 The report of the special master was confirmed by the District…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- McMillan v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Dickinson v. O. & W. THUM CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Atlanta Knitting Mills v. Nathanson Bros.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Thos. S. Aubry Co. v. United Toledo Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Bagley v. RowleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Industrial Commission of Ohio v. Highway Const. Co. of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- New Southern Ohio Gas Co. v. RoushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.